Re: helmet measurements (was: Duh!)

Ya know, I guess you're right about bh not being about anything in 
particular, but I really don't need all the articles from fark reposted 
into my mail.

Sorry if I sound like a dick.

On Mar 2, 2004, at 9:23 PM, Olhado wrote:

>
> Interesting.
>
> * Nicholas Bonfatti <[email protected]> [2004-03-02 16:14:28 -0500]:
>
>> fluff stuff like that really isn't what BH is about.
>
> I had kind of percieved that BH wasn't really *about* anything, rather
> it was more along the lines of *not* being about anything.  As I
> understand it, the tone of this list has of late become more serious
> than it once was, but have we really come to the point as a community
> where we should be defining ourselves?
>
> In any case, we seem to have evolved, in some regards, into a
> "meta-news" source. That said, I'd be hesitant to discourage anyone
> from posting something to this list, no matter what it is.  With no
> apparent editorial policy, how is one to differentiate between what to
> post or not to post?
>
> Does BH have an editorial policy? Should it?
>
>
> -o
> _______________________________________________
> heads mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/
> http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/
>

_______________________________________________
heads mailing list
[email protected]
http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/
http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/