Re: Re: Outsourcing: (was: Russell / Capital Destroying Jobs / Mar 04
"Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Vermont |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Nicholas Bonfatti wrote: > Aaron: > wtf? You're doing a shitload of ranting without positing a central > argument, (or organizing your thoughts, for that matter.) What do you > think should be done about this recent offshoring phenomenon? i guess i'm just following the format. regardless, i think you caught on: i didn't propose "what should be done." you're right. i'm just trying to raise the point that we shouldn't fall for these lines that outsourcing is done in the best interest of everyone (koom-by-yah). they sold (and still sell) nafta and free trade this way (see Tom Friedman's February 29, 2004 opinion piece in NY Times). wait awhile and you find out the moved jobs just move again (as they are from mexico). we may want to get all religoius about the industry and how wee see ourselves in it. seeing things in terms of "innovation", "superiority" and that the problem is ourselves (self-guilt--another religious practice), but that same shit flew over the manufacturing industry too: "American products are the best in the world. They'll never move them.", "We need more training." and all the companies that used to manufactur goods now just maintain patents and marketing control over their "innovations". not a lot of production. now this won't happen exactly the same with IT workers. they *know* their jobs are going elsewhere (shit, some are training the very people they're losing their job to) . they're just becoming complicit because they think business always works out for the best. shit, the IT industry can't even dole out jobs to women and minorities in an equitable fashion. who trusts them a chance on the international scene? so this "oh well" and "we've got to evolve (into management)" attitude is junk. so, once we get rid of these *assumptions*, perhaps we *can* talk about "alternatives". i'd say a simple alternative is a world where jobs can't be moved from country to country just for profit motives. maybe i'm naive. i do look forward to working with computer professionals throughout the world (India has an FSF installation <http://www.fsf.org.in/>). > I've tried to answer some of your questions below. thanks. /a _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/