Report from Boston (fwd)
"Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:55:39 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Vermont |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pieinsky To: Marxism List Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:03:52 -0400 Subject: Report from Boston I just got back from Boston where I had gone for the protests on the concluding day, Thursday, of the Democratic Convention. It doesn't take a Marxist structural analysis of the class nature of the state and of the obfuscatory role therein of the Two Party System to conclude that the Iraq War is almost as much a war of Kerry and the numerous other Democrats who voted for it in Congress as it is a war of Bush, Cheney and the neo-conservative cabal. Kerry et al are blaming the Bush gang for misleading them about the existence of WMD's, an Iraq-Al Qaeda connection, and so on. But what a crock! The truth was available if they had cared to go looking for it. They didn't; they didn't want to stand up to Bush. Soon, if the Dems win the election in November, it will be their war lock, stock and barrel. Kerry, betraying the last vestige of his anti-war credentials from his days with the Vietnam Veterans Against the War -- a period almost entirely edited out of the convention propaganda film shown last night - keeps going on about expanding the war (oops, sorry, in the Democratic political-ese, "including" others in it). And didn't Edwards even state the other night in his speech to the Convention that they want to "win" the war outright? It would be ironical if Bush came across, a la Nixon 1968, as the peacemaker, as the one with the "plan" to bring the war to a close and thus were able to win his re-election. Anyway, what I want to know is: Where were the big crowds of demonstrators that should have been down at the convention confronting these warmongers? Back last Sunday, ANSWER had a demonstration which drew a couple thousand people, that's it. Yesterday was far worse. In the early afternoon, I joined a march organized, if that's the right term, by the young punky anarchist crowd. This march at least had some energy as it zig-zagged back and forth in downtown Boston ending up as close as we could get - about a block - from the heavily guarded convention at the Fleet Center. There was some back and forth on the street with the cops, and an effigy with two faces representing Bush and Kerry as parts of the same body was put to the match and that got on TV, at least the local TV I saw later. But there were only a couple of hundred people in this march, including the handful of Greens, anti-imperialists, and assorted miscellaneous peace folks who followed in the train. The latest anarchist fashion style seems to be to attire themselves as swashbuckling pirates, sporting black tri-cornered hats and swinging dummy cutlasses. There were some sporadic chants of "No Blood for Oil" and the like but very few placards of any coherence. What the fairly large numbers of ordinary Bostonians observing this march from the sidewalks and windows made of this motley spectacle, I can only conjecture. After that scene quieted down, I decided to hang out there by the convention center to spend some time snapping photos of the infamous caged "free speech zone" and await the late afternoon/early evening announced protest organized by the other national anti-war coalition, United for Peace and Justice. I was hoping that it would be bigger and, if not necessarily as rhetorically strident as the anarchists, at least would be somewhat more politically coherent. No such luck. The same group that has been demanding, until it recently threw in the towel, a site to protest in New York City for the Republican convention that could accommodate up to 250,000 people could only muster about 40 to 50 people for this one!!! It was pitiful. And the politics? Among other speakers, Dennis Kucinch and Tom Hayden were trotted out to make a plea for the anti-war movement to get behind Kerry as our first order of business despite whatever his "faults" or "weaknesses". (At least Kucinch, when he made this pitch, got booed a little bit. I guess people don't expect anything otherwise out of Hayden.) Other speakers made equally clear that they see the work of their coalition as a pressure group on the Democrats. Speakers kept asking for people in the "crowd" to raise their voices so that Kerry could hear them. Lots of luck when you were kept at such a distance by a cordon of riot police and massive fortifications of high chain link fence and concrete. Even ten thousand people would have had a hard time making any kind of meaningful impression. But where *were* the angry anti-war people who should have come out? Is the problem that the seemingly left-liberal leadership of UPJ -- I don't include in this the more radical ANSWER which, for all I know, may be hamstrung in its organizing now because of the WWP's recent factional disputes -- didn't want to embarrass Kerry because they're so fully ABB so they didn't organize in more than a token fashion, if at all, outside of the immediate Boston area. No word of it leaked up to Vermont; I found out via the Internet. Nevertheless, the greater Boston area itself is a large metropolis with all kinds of socialists, solidarity activists, Quakers, and "dissidents" of one stripe or another, not to mention the masses. You can't get out more than 40 or 50 from Boston? We can put that many anti-war people on the streets with only a little effort here in Vermont in the town of Montpelier, population less than 10,000. If anybody on this List is from Boston or has any other insights on this, I'd sure like to know. I'm glad I did it for other reasons -- such as a glimpse of America's future in these concentration camp-like "free speech zones." But I'm pretty bummed out about the lack of turnout. I hate to think what we can expect from UPJ's organizing for the Republican Convention in NYC. jay This article explains how the organizers around Boston, except for the anarchists, basically sat on their hands because of their ABB philosophy: http://www.thehill.com/news/072604/protests.aspx/. I say, "Shame on you!" This will come back to bite you later. jay www.neravt.com/left/ I've posted some photos I took of the "free speech zone" at http://www.neravt.com/left/zone.html. Enjoy. jay _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/