"BREAKING" news from truthout
dvanhorn <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:45:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Truthout.org sends a daily summary of noteworthy news stories. Every now and then (and quiet frequently lately), in addition to their summary they send single stories as they break. Today TO sent out a "BREAKING" story on Nader's contributions from a Republican. The story has 0 news value, much less is it BREAKING. As it states in the article, the story has been out for at least a month, since that's when Nader commented on the situation in his widely publicized debate with Dean on NPR. On 8/10, TO sent a "FOCUS" email (like "BREAKING", only different) with the title "FOCUS - Kerry: "Why Did Bush Rush to War?"". If you actually read the article it's title: "Kerry Says His Vote on Iraq Would Be the Same Today". Kerry states he would, knowing everything he knows at this point in time, still vote yes for the war in Iraq, but he goes to ask, "My question to President Bush is, Why did he rush to war without a plan to win the peace?" and "Why did he rush to war on faulty intelligence and not do the hard work necessary to give America the truth?" "Why did he mislead America about how he would go to war? Why has he not brought other countries to the table in order to support American troops in the way that we deserve it and relieve a pressure from the American people?" John Kerry's schizophrenia is much like that of his supporters. He thinks that he can authorize the president's war, and yet expects his concerns addressed after the fact. John Kerry has the power (and in fact the obligation), granted by the Constitution, to check the power of the president: to withhold authorization until his concerns (and ours) are addressed. He failed to do so, and moreover, he embraces that failure as part of his campaign strategy. Likewise, Kerry supports delusionally believe Kerry will lead to peace in Iraq as he plans for, and openly advocates, escalation. This message of "bombing for peace" is indeed central to philosophy of Kerry supporters. Independence should afford some integrity. Apparently that's not the case at truthout.org. David BREAKING: Bush Finance Honcho Donated to Nader The Associated Press Thursday 12 August 2004 BOSTON - Ralph Nader has found an unexpected friend in Massachusetts. Hopkinton computer tycoon Richard Egan, the Bush campaign's finance chairman in John Kerry's home state, has personally contributed the maximum amount allowed by law -- $2,000 -- to Nader's presidential campaign. Egan's son John and daughter in law have each also "maxed out," bringing the family's total to $6,000. Bush backers are hoping Nader will siphon enough votes from Kerry to tip the election to President Bush. The co-founder of data storage giant EMC Corp. and Bush's former ambassador to Ireland, Egan is legendary in Republican circles for his ability to collect hundreds of thousands in campaign dollars. He's a member of an elite group of Bush fund-raisers known as "Rangers" -- those who have helped raised more than $200,000 for the campaign. Egan's two sons are also Rangers. Egan, who is retired from EMC and stepped down last year as ambassador, has an unlisted phone number. A message left for John Egan was not immediately returned on Thursday. While Nader has criticized both Kerry and Bush, it is Democrats who fear him most. Many blame him for luring away enough disgruntled Democrats in 2000 to cost Al Gore the presidency. During a debate last month with former Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean, Nader said he didn't know Egan, but defended his right to accept money from Republicans. "He's an American citizen who is a Republican, just happens to believe in civil liberties maybe," Nader said during the debate on National Public Radio. "I don't even know the man." Nader's prospects for getting on the ballot in Massachusetts are unclear. He needs to submit certified signatures from 10,000 registered voters by Aug. 31. Democratic Secretary of State William Galvin has said Nader may not pass that threshold. Gary Hoffman, a spokesman for the Nader campaign in Massachusetts, said the campaign has close to the 10,000 signatures and is confident Nader will get a spot on the ballot. _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/