Unicode and Scheme

dvanhorn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.ballistichelmet.lambda
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[ For any on the list who have an interest in Unicode & Scheme. -d ]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Unicode and Scheme
Resent-Date: Sat,  7 Feb 2004 23:33:28 +0100 (NFT)
Resent-From: srfi-50-D5jPTyc31mpbJb6xxNauyti2O/[email protected]
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:49:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]>
To: srfi-50-D5jPTyc31mpbJb6xxNauyti2O/[email protected], [email protected]



I mentioned earlier that I've submitted a draft SRFI about changes and
extensions to R5RS to make Scheme extended-character-set-friendly
(Unicode-friendly in particular).

I've drafted two additional proposals for:

~ Specifications for what happens if Unicode codepoints are,
  indeed representable as CHAR? values.

~ Specifications for identifier syntax and meaning if identifiers
  can be written using non-ASCII, Unicode characters.

These can be found at:

  http://regexps.srparish.net/srfi-drafts/INDEX.html

which contains:

* "Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets":
   basic changes needed to R5RS to make Unicode-based Schemes
   practical and conformant.

* "Scheme Characters as (Extended) Unicode Codepoints":
   Defining the CHAR? type to be a superset of Unicode codepoints.

* "Unicode Identifiers":
  Internationalizing the Scheme Programming Language.

  Note: "Unicode Identifiers" is the roughest of the three documents
  and I'm certain I could use some help with it.


It also contains some other string-related documents which aren't
Unicode-specific but which do make proposals that would interact with
both Unicode characters and strings and FFIs.

-t
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.