Re: type theory in coq.

cpratt-UYko1UTVIqz2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.org.ballistichelmet.lambda
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting dvanhorn <[email protected]>:

> dvanhorn wrote:
> > Theorem determinacy :
> >   forall t t' t'', (red1 t t') /\ (red1 t t'') -> t'=t''.
> >   intros.
> 
> Theorem determinacy :
>     forall t t', (red1 t t') -> forall t'', (red1 t t'') -> t'=t''.
> induction 1; intros.
> inversion_clear H.
> reflexivity.
> inversion H0.
> inversion_clear H.
> reflexivity.
> inversion H0.
> generalize H; clear H.
> inversion_clear H0; intro H0.
> inversion H0.
> inversion H0.
> rewrite <- IHred1 with (1:=H).
> reflexivity.
> Qed.
> 
> 


Does that mean you'll be giving yourself a dollar?  Buying yourself coffee?  
Patting yourself on the back?  I mean, c'mon, if you'd have given me two more 
months to get around to it, I would've figured it out.  jeez.

-x
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.