Re: type theory in coq.
cpratt-UYko1UTVIqz2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.lambda |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting dvanhorn <[email protected]>: > dvanhorn wrote: > > Theorem determinacy : > > forall t t' t'', (red1 t t') /\ (red1 t t'') -> t'=t''. > > intros. > > Theorem determinacy : > forall t t', (red1 t t') -> forall t'', (red1 t t'') -> t'=t''. > induction 1; intros. > inversion_clear H. > reflexivity. > inversion H0. > inversion_clear H. > reflexivity. > inversion H0. > generalize H; clear H. > inversion_clear H0; intro H0. > inversion H0. > inversion H0. > rewrite <- IHred1 with (1:=H). > reflexivity. > Qed. > > Does that mean you'll be giving yourself a dollar? Buying yourself coffee? Patting yourself on the back? I mean, c'mon, if you'd have given me two more months to get around to it, I would've figured it out. jeez. -x