Re: [siteplan] Fuel quality
Brian Jamison <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:19:52 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.clubs.gobiodiesel.mixmasters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1165882792.15608.96.camel@white-dragon> |
When do we get the results back from that fuel test we did a while back? -B On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 20:36 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Zac, > > I was reading more about the 3/27 test on-line last night and the > verdict was that washed fuel needed to be DRY, otherwise water may > settle out. This makes me think we should consider testing reacted > fuel before the 5% wash is added, so there is no excess water to > "cloud" the results. > > This is a learning experience like all the rest.... > > Thanks, > > Felix > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: Zac Imboden <[email protected]> > We need to run all the tests that we can for every batch and > be rigorous about dealing with the results. It was my decision > to wash and dry the "failed" fuel, because I wanted to see > what happened to it through that process. We will test it > again carefully after drying and determine whether it needs to > be re-reacted, which is probably what will happen. > > > On Dec 10, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Pete Kramer wrote: > > > I feel fuel quality comes up once and a while, but then gets > > swept under the run b/c raw production takes presedence and > > coop memebers are willing to buy it regardless. I honestly > > don't feel we are churning out anything bad, but I do feel > > we need tighter quality control. These kinds of things are > > never a problem until its too late!! > > > > Lets get this back at the forefront of our > > planning/discussions! > > > > Pete > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Felix Kersting <[email protected]> > > To: siteplan <[email protected]>; GoBiodiesel > > Mixmasters <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:07:32 PM > > Subject: [siteplan] Fuel quality > > > > Friends, > > > > Thanks to all for some great work party accomplishments on > > Saturday. > > > > I know we are working hard to get the reactors back on line, > > but I would > > like to discuss fuel quality. While we are at this pause in > > production, > > we need to re-examine the fuel quality issue. Zac has been > > testing our > > fuel with the 3/27 test and from what I have heard, none has > > passed. > > This test is reported to be a good quick indicator of > > biodiesel purity: > > no unreacted glycerindes. > > > > I would like to suggest that we buy a sample of SeQuential > > from Blue Sky > > and test it just for fun. > > > > I think it would be prudent for someone to be working in the > > back ground > > to refine our processing (using 1 liter batches) to get the > > chemistry > > right so we pass the test every time. > > > > These suggestions may be way out of whack if we have tested > > and are sure > > we are passing the ASTM quality test. Perhaps we need to > > pony up the > > cash to just go ahead and do tha t test after we get back > > on-line and are > > satisfied we are back to our standard production, then > > correlate the > > results with the ASTM grade stuff. > > > > Thoughts from anyone? > > > > Felix > > _______________________________________________ > > siteplan mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gobiodiesel.org/mailman/listinfo/siteplan > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > > _______________________________________________ > > siteplan mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gobiodiesel.org/mailman/listinfo/siteplan > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Zac Imboden > [email protected] > 1534 SE 35th Place > Portland, OR > 97214 > 971-563-2477 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > siteplan mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gobiodiesel.org/mailman/listinfo/siteplan -- Brian Jamison President, Board of Directors GoBiodiesel Cooperative