Re: Asynchronous access to disk files

"David Phillips" <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:03:41 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.org.djb.miscellaneous
Message-ID <006f01c33160$c6627ab0$0201a8c0@brinstar>
Paul Jarc writes:
> Not just because they expect it, but because it actually is ignored.

Right.  What I should have asked is this: Why have a new option instead of
making O_NONBLOCK work in that manner?

-- 
David Phillips <[email protected]>
http://david.acz.org/