SCO Page Hack
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:41:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
List chatter says this page is a hack on the SCO site by someone of the alias realloc(). It also shows up on the site-wide navigation menus, under Company -> Intellectual Property -> Red Hat v. SCO Seth > http://www.sco.com/redhat/ Red Hat v. SCO Red Hat, Inc. filed suit against The SCO Group, Inc. on August 4, 2003 seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement of copyrights and declaratory judgment of no misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as accusing SCO of false advertising in violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, deceptive trade practices, unfair competition, tortious interference with prospective business opportunities and trade libel and disparagement. Judge Sue Robinson in the U.S. District Court in Delaware has stayed the case pending the outcome of the SCO vs. IBM case. October 4, 2004 Red Hat, Inc. v. The SCO Group, Inc., C.A. No. 03-772 (SLR) (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20041004_rh_rh-v-sco.pdf) May 4, 2004 SCO's Opposition to Red Hat's Motion for Reconsideration Statement of Facts (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040504_rh_opposition-to-rh.pdf) April 20, 2004 Memorandum of Law in Support of Red hat, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040420_rh_memo-of-law.pdf) April 20, 2004 Motion for Reconsideration (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040420_rh_memo-of-reconsideration.pdf) April 6, 2004 Memorandum Order (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040406_rh_memo-order.pdf) February 26, 2004 Reply of Red Hat Inc. in Support of Motion to Supplement the Record (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040226_rh_reply-to-rh.pdf) February 11, 2004 Motion to Supplement the Record (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040211_rh_motion-to-supplement.pdf) October 10, 2003 Defendant The SCO Group, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031010_rh_defendant-reply.pdf) October 6, 2003 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031006_rh_stipulation-order-to-extend.pdf) October 1, 2003 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031001_rh_motion-to-stay.pdf) September 30, 2003 Red Hat, Inc. v. The SCO Group, Inc., C.A. No. 03-772-SLR (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030930_rh_rh-v-sco.pdf) September 29, 2003 Red Hat's Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion to Dismiss (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030929_rh_memo-in-opposition.pdf) September 15, 2003 Defendant the SCO Group, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030915_rh_opening-brief.pdf) August 4, 2003 Red Hat files suit against The SCO Group, Inc. (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030804_rh_rh-files-suit.pdf) -- DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.