Agenda for March 29 Hague Convention Meet
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:07:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Hague-jur-commercial-law] Agenda for March 29 IP issues & Hague Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:54:57 -0500 From: Manon Ress <[email protected]> To: [email protected] SECRETARY OF STATE'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW DRAFT HAGUE CONVENTION ON EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Conference Center, Henry Remsen Building 400 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 AGENDA 2:00 PM Welcome and Introduction -- Jeffrey Kovar & Jennifer Ness 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM Scope of exclusion of IP matters (Art. 2.2.k) -- what types should be excluded? -- what types of claims should be included in the convention? - validity? - infringement? Scope of inclusion of IP matters (Art. 2.2.k & 2.3) -- should license and other contract disputes be included? -- other "incidental questions"? Drafting -- can the drafting of these provisions be improved? -- see drafting suggestion para 45, page 14, of the December 2004 Report by Hartley and Dogauchi 4:00 PM - 4:30 PM Stay of Proceedings (Art. 6) -- should the convention permit a court to stay proceedings under the choice of court agreement so that a party can pursue a ruling on an incidental question? -- should this provision apply to any matters excluded from scope under Article 2? 4:30 - 5:30 PM Stay or Denial of Enforcement Based on Incidental Ruling (Art. 10) -- is the effect of paragraph (1) clear; is it desirable? -- should a court be permitted to deny enforcement of that part of a judgment that is inconsistent with a ruling on an incidental question? (para. 2) -- should a court be permitted to stay enforcement proceedings to permit parties to litigate an incidental question elsewhere? (para 3) 5:30 PM - 6:00 PM Other Issues -- Validity of the Choice of Court Agreement: - should the convention cover click agreements? - are the validity rules in Articles 5, 7, and 9 adequate to protect vulnerable parties? -- Other Issues -- Manon Anne Ress [email protected], www.cptech.org Consumer Project on Technology in Washington, DC PO Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036, USA Tel.: +1.202.387.8030, fax: +1.202.234.5176 Consumer Project on Technology in Geneva, 1 Route des Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland. Tel: +41 22 791 6727 Consumer Project on Technology in London, 24 Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX, UK. Tel:+44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252. Mob:+44(0)790 386 4642. Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607 _______________________________________________ Hague-jur-commercial-law mailing list [email protected] http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/hague-jur-commercial-law