Piggybank: Now, we're talking!
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2005 01:29:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> http://simile.mit.edu/piggy-bank/ This is the end game, folks. It's all over, and look, it finally came out, before Grokster was decided, so the historical juncture is assured. You publish information, we all use it. That's what it's all about. If SCOTUS had already put out some sort of formula for addressing the use of decentralized search engines and end-to-end connectivity, we would have had to wrangle with that legal premise. Now we win. We are now bricoleurs, and most decidedly no longer mere consumers of pure information, no matter how enchanted we may be with the original expression created and presented to us by anyone else. We can now make full flexible use of published information, we can now demonstrate how intimate is our need to own fully functional generic logic devices, and to exercise the full breadth of capacities that we now have through the ubiquitous establishment of IP-based end-to-end connectivity. This mode of application of the Internet tells the whole story. Now, manipulating published information becomes a mode of speech for all, a ubiquitous vernacular, not solely something you use reified tools for. There are no "P2P" applications. "P2P" is the Internet. We can now begin expressing, employing and sharing abstract protocols and algorithms, with a full mutual understanding that that is what they are, and that that is the coin of the realm, not static applications -- and we now know intrinsically that this is the degree of flexibility of syntax and paradigm that we require, to exercise our capacities with the full freedom of language itself. There is no spoon. Seth -- DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.