On 2nd Day WIPO SCCR and the "Newest Internet Treaty"
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:26:01 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Broadcast-discuss] More news from WIPO re the "newest internet treaty" Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:34:51 -0500 From: Manon Ress <[email protected]> To: [email protected],Broadcast Discuss <[email protected]> Geneva, Standing committee on copyright and related rights. This morning, after a few NGOs interventions regarding limitations and exceptions, the committee started to talk about what they really care about: the webcasters' treaty. 7 hours or so about it. Phase 1, discussion of the scope of the treaty and how it will include webcasters. Nigeria had a great image to summarize the "alternative paper" proposed by the chair which include 3 options the opt in, opt out or protocol. For Nigeria, these are 3 doors that lead to the same room. The same delegation did a great job explaining that including "simulcasting" (the EU's proposal) is the same as including webcasting, since if you accept simulcasting in...webcasting will follow. Developing countries took the floor to express their opposition to webcasting again and again but the chair kept it on the table no matter how much opposition was expressed. I understand that there was a lot of noise and many delegations complained and even ask to hear some NGOs but the Chair did not allow NGOs to take the floor. Phase 2 of the meeting focused on the substantive rights and was just as negative. Delegations after delegations opposed extensive rights, TPMs, longer terms. Some brought up the UNESCO work on cultural diversity and the need to limit broadcasters rights. It was noted again that article 6, rights of retransmission on computer network is also a back door way to include webcasting. The meeting ended "in the middle of a sentence"... and will resume tomorrow at 10am. Let me know if you want to talk to Jamie who is in Geneva. Manon PS some delegates have been complaining that right holders groups have been lobbying in their capital to prevent them from doing their job in Geneva. It's getting nasty. ************************************************ Manon Anne Ress [email protected], www.cptech.org Consumer Project on Technology 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel.: +1.202.332.2670, Ext 16 Fax: +1.202.332.2673 Consumer Project on Technology 1 Route des Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 791 6727 Consumer Project on Technology 24 Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX, UK Tel: +44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252 Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607 _______________________________________________ Broadcast-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/broadcast-discuss