Re: MPAA draft state super-DMCA amendment
iriXx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | [email protected] |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
do you have a URL for the draft at Freedom to Tinker?...
thanks
m~
David Turner wrote:
> Hi. I'm the new listmaster for dmca-activists. I was at the public
> hearing yesterday for the MA bill 2743, the state super-DMCA.
>
> What do people on-list think of the MPAA's new draft bill which is up on
> Freedom To Tinker?
>
> The primary change is the addition of "with the intent to defraud a
> communication service provider" to the beginning of the section which
> defines offenses. This seems to be an improvement, but I feel that
> there are still risks for Free Software. For instance, there's a
> chilling effect, because there's a private right of action. Taking
> MythTV as an example, skipping commercials could be considered
> "defrauding" a communication service provider. General time and space
> shifting might also, if prohibited by some user agreement (probably,
> future pay TV services will come with such agreements).
>
> Any other comments?
>
>
--
|\ _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ HTTP 503: Too Busy
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL
.::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.
gnupg key ID: AEB7A31E