Re: MPAA draft state super-DMCA amendment

another concern i had was that there seemed to be in this bill a means 
of putting hypothetical value on downloads, even when there was no proof:


(2) The court may:
(i) award declaratory relief and other equitable remedies, including 
preliminary and final injunctions to prevent or restrain violations of 
this section, without requiring proof that the plaintiff has suffered, 
or will suffer, actual damages, irreparable harm or lacks an adequate 
remedy at law;

this seems to clear the way for calculating losses due to P2P downloads 
by the number of files shared - which is always a misnomer. i am 
assuming that the primary purpose of outlawing these 'communication 
devices' is anti-P2P?

best,

m~





-- 
        |\      _,,,---,,_
  ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     HTTP 503: Too Busy
       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
     '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL


  .::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.

             gnupg key ID: AEB7A31E