Re: Pre-emptive comment on "NY Fair Use" dispute
The Guttersnipe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Personally I couldn't give a damn about NY this or NY that or him or the other him or who was there first or last or anything. I am tired of this argument and I know others must be as well. Neither side means anything to me, the only thing that matters here is that we get information out and we get people concerned and active. Who "owns" the information is meaningless to me, and that is why I am here, I think information should be open to everyone and the the control over information not be caught in a strangle hold by it's laywer wielding lawyer. Now I have to read about this side or that side reaching for their lawyer here as well? That's absurd! This petty factionalism is stupid, and can only weaken our efforts. I hope that I am not seen as out of line but I imagine that I cannot be the only person frustrated by this constant bickering over NY Fair use, I would go so far as to say that about 1/8 of the content on this list is on this topic and most of us don't even live in NY. Frustrated, The Guttersnipe --- Dan Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2003 10:35, Seth Finkelstein wrote: > > Uh-oh ... as this list has another round of the dispute > > over who is NY Fair Use > > Wait, someone should *copyright* something to do with NY Fair Use, > and then > use the DMCA to bludgeon the other party. ===== The time to speak up is now! Free Speech is slipping away http://www.eff.org/cafe/ Freedom to think, Freedom to share, Freedom to change the future, Free Software http://www.gnu.org, http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ In this entropic Universe, live a negentropic life with ever expanding moments of epiphany! __________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus For a better Internet experience http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer