Activism and NY Copyright Stakeholders vs NY Fair Use
Seth Finkelstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would like to submit the following thought for consideration to those who are reflexively attacking the disputants: If you sneer at injustice when it faces you, how in the world can you expect anyone else to respect your activism? This is a very deep, serious, question. If you say, "Get a life you losers! Shut up! Go away!", then what do you say to anyone who then turns around and says to *you*, about the DMCA, "Get a life you losers! Shut up! Go away!". After all, the RIAA works very hard to portray the DMCA opposition as a bunch of kiddie thieves who are upset that they can't steal from artists, and need to grow up and stop whining about not being able be freeloaders. Simplistically flaming both parties simply helps the one who has done wrong. It doesn't aid the cause in any way. The NY Copyright Stakeholders vs NY Fair Use argument is a bunch of *"intellectual property"* charges. There is supreme irony in that. -- Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer [email protected] http://sethf.com Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/ Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/