Senator Brownback: "Let's Make A Deal"
Seth Johnson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(Forwarded from Pho list) -------- Original Message -------- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 01:02:40 EDT From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Drew Clark reports in the June 3rd Technology Daily that Senator Sam Brownback is preparing to introduce legislation that would: --Bar any Federal mandate for copy-control technology. --Effectively reverse the District Court decision regarding the scope of the Section 512(h) subpoena power to compel the disclosure of ISP subscriber identity, as delivered in the RIAA v Verizon case. --Require clear and conspicuous consumer disclosures on all copy-controled CDs and other DRMed products. --Affirm that the first sale doctrine applies to digital media. --Require the FTC to study and report to Congress as to whether DRM technologies impede lawful uses of digital media. The bill would authorize the FCC to mandate a "broadcast flag" for over-the-air digital TV transmissions -- but only if it preserved reasonable consumer, educational, and library rights; was based on objective standards rather than requirements to use a particular copy control technology; and permitted manufacturers to self-certify compliance. Brownback, a conservative Republican from Kansas, Chairs the Science, Technology and Space Subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee. Phosters who support the thrust of the bill should encourage their own Senators to cosponsor the legislation. Philip S. Corwin Partner Butera & Andrews 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20004 202-347-6875 (voice)/-6876 (fax) [email protected] "Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey -- DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/cc.html I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.