FCC Overruled: Broadband Internet Not Just "Information Service"
"Seth Johnson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(Good news from the Cybertelecommunications Policy list. -- Seth) -----Original Message----- From: Robert Cannon <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 13:23:25 -0700 Subject: [CYBERTEL] 9th Circuit Reverses FCC Internet over Cable Decision - link On the 9th Circuit Website Opinions are available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/opinions+by+date?OpenVi ew&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1#1.1 The FCC decision is available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/58AF00C2122345DD88256DB 7005BFAA3/$file/0270518.pdf?openelement The conclusion is [5] Our holding in Mesa Verde, along with that of the Supreme Court in Neal, requires our adherence to the interpretation of the Communications Act we announced in Portland. There, we concluded that cable broadband service was not a cable service but instead was part telecommunications service and part information service. Because the Commissions Declaratory Ruling agreed with our conclusion that cable broadband service is not cable service, but disagreed with our conclusion that it is in part telecommunications service, we must [6] AFFIRM in part, VACATE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.14 ===== || \ @@==+ Leashes! ====== We Don't Need No Stinkin' Leashes! || || -Pancho Villa Washington Internet Project www.cybertelecom.org