Fwd: IT: DMCA Exemption for censorware renewed!
Seth Finkelstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:57:24 -0500 From: Seth Finkelstein To: "Seth Finkelstein's InfoThought list" Subject: IT: Victory - DMCA Exemption for censorware renewed! For the past several months, I have been working on advocating for DMCA exemptions, in particular the exemption for censorware. Today, (Oct 28) the Copyright Office released its ruling on DMCA exemptions. The censorware exemption was one of only four granted, out of all proposed. The Register has attributed that exemption primarily to *ME*! More info: http://www.copyright.gov/1201/ http://www.copyright.gov/1201/docs/librarian_statement_01.html http://www.copyright.gov/1201/docs/registers-recommendation.pdf My testimony: http://sethf.com/anticensorware/hearing_dc.php From The Recommendation of the Register of Copyrights: The Register's recommendation in favor of this exemption is based primarily on the evidence introduced in the comments and testimony by one person, Seth Finkelstein, a non-lawyer participating on his own behalf. In addition to identifying a class of works that related to the specific facts presented, he identified the qualitative nature of the noninfringing uses for which circumvention was necessary and generally identified the technological measure which controlled access to this class. There was no dispute that the lists of Internet locations blocked by filtering software are generally encrypted or otherwise protected by an access control measure. The remedy sought was causally related to the noninfringing uses that are necessary to conduct research, comment and criticism on the filtering software at issue. Mr. Finkelstein also anticipated objections to the exemption and proved that available alternatives to the exemption were insufficient to remedy the adverse effect caused by the prohibition. The insufficiency of alternatives was supported by testimony and demonstrative evidence at the hearing in California by James Tyre. Finally, Mr. Finkelstein's succinct initial comment addressed the statutory requirements and thoughtfully analyzed each of the statutory factors required to be considered in this rulemaking. -- Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer [email protected] http://sethf.com Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/ Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/ _______________________________________________ Infothought mailing list http://sethf.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/infothought