Re: 3rd Circuit Reverses FCC Media Ownership Rule Changes
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:46:08 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brook North wrote: > > Anyone know if the complete opinion is available online (for free)? The Media Access Group's summary (text pasted below): > http://www.mediaaccess.org/prometheus_decision/index.html The decision: > http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/033388p.pdf Media Access's PDF summary, at the link below is also very helpful. Seth --- > http://www.mediaaccess.org/prometheus_decision/index.html STATEMENT OF MEDIA ACCESS PROJECT REACTING TO U.S. COURT OF APPEALS MEDIA OWNERSHIP DECISION Andrew Jay Schwartzman, President and CEO of Media Access Project, has issued the following statement in response to todayÂs decision of the United States Court of Appeals in Philadelphia reversing the Federal Communications CommissionÂs June, 2003 action which would have significantly deregulated broadcast media ownership rules: This is a big, big win for diversity in the media. The Court has ruled in our favor on almost every issue in the case. The judges agreed with us that preserving democracy is more important than helping big companies grow bigger. Perhaps the most important part of the decision is the CourtÂs holding that the FCC improperly applied a presumption in favor of deregulation in its review of the broadcast media ownership rules. The CourtÂs directive that the FCC take its deregulatory thumb off the scale virtually assures a different outcome when the FCC revisits the question in response to the CourtÂs decision. We won on almost every issue we raised. While the Court did uphold the FCCÂs authority to eliminate the current prohibition on new newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership, its remand to the FCC gives us the chance to prove that these limitations are necessary for local civic discourse. Almost as important as what we won is what the big broadcasters didnÂt win. The Court decisively rejected claims that the FCC hadnÂt deregulated enough, and that the existing ownership scheme is unconstitutional. 30/30/30 MAP's Statement and Attached Backgrounders (http://www.mediaaccess.org/prometheus_decision/MAPStatementReMediaOwnershipCase.pdf) Contact: Harold Feld 202 454-5684 Cheryl Leanza 202 454-5683 Andrew Jay Schwartzman 202 454-5681 Decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC (622 KB) (http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/recentop/week/recprec.htm) Summary of the Decision Summary (http://www.mediaaccess.org/prometheus_decision/prometheussummaryfinal062404.pdf) -- DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.