Re: MOUS alternative

Wiebe van der Worp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.education.europe
Organization ViaISN
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ian, that is great! We definite should adopt it here in the Netherlands 
as well. We have a "digital drivers license" (NL: digitaal rijbewijs) 
here, based on proprietory software. An alternative is more than welcome!

I will also send this reply to:
[email protected] (EU, hope to get some responce...)
[email protected] (Dutch OOo group)
[email protected] (core Vrijschrift members)
[email protected] (Matto Fransen GNU/Linux)
[email protected] (Blender and education)

Dutch speaking people are invited to react on 
http://vrijschrift.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=4

Regards Wiebe van der Worp

[email protected] wrote:
> I am starting to put together a system of certification for competence in OpenOffice.org. This is to counter things like MOUS and to an extent ECDL which are MS Office focused. I will be starting with a certificate for complete beginners, but will then develop more advanced certificates initially in line with the English vocational qualifications framework. Have entered intial discussion with OpenOffice.org for endorsement. Already have 3 potential pilot sites for the basic certificate herein England with all 3 running large Linux at the desktop installations with OO.org or Star Office. If others are interested, drop me an E-mail and I'll keep you informed. It should not be too difficult to make certificates fit any national qualifications frameworks should this be desirable.
> 
> Having certificated qualifications is a low cost way of marketing and providing credibility for the use of free software. It also provides a potential service revenue stream for commercial companies wanting to make free software part of their business strategy.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ian Lynch
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.