Re: Education strategy
Hilaire Fernandes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fsf.education.europe |
|---|---|
| Organization | OFSET |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 12 May 2002 13:16:09 +0100 Alistair Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hilaire Fernandes wrote: > > > > > > The main problem is inability to run Windows > > > > based education software - WINE is a possibility but we have to get hold of > > > > the software to test and testing takes time. For the time being we are > > > > concentrating on low cost thin clients > > > > > > There is a lot of free educational software that could be substituted. There is > > > also the important task of getting teachers to contribute GPL'ed content for > > > new free educational e-books etc.. Keep it free and maximise cooperation => > > > productivity & efficiency. If you are being ordered to buy a particular > > > proprietary product then blow the whistle here and in the TES etc.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Getting education titles to run under WINE > > > > is a high priority but difficult for a small company. > > > > > > WINE is said to be very good now but most free software was written to run on > > > GNU and BSD. (BSD licening is to be avioded due to propritization, vis Mac OS > > > X.) > > > > I agree. In term of freedom it may not be a good idea to promote the use of Windows software > > under a GNU system. Althougth such Windows may be free it may not be easy to modify such > > software under a GNU system. What if the free education software was developped with VB, > > Delphi or any other non free development tool? Instead we could look at porting such > > software or write new one from the ground. > > This is what we are doing at OFSET. GCompris was written in the idea to replace software as > > ASIBOU (quite famous software in France) and DrGenius to replace Geometer's Sketchpad or Cabri. > > Of course more need to be done and we are always looking for new volunteers. > > Wine is important because it lets people continue using their old > (albeit non-free) software after switching to a free OS. It increases > the chances of them using free software in situations where there's one > or two apps they use that don't have a diect equivalent under *nix. I understand the issue you are pointing at. What are these software teacher may still want/need to use under a GNU system? We can promote a port or the writting of free equivalent for GNU but we need an accurate list. Do you have some idea ? Hilaire