Re: Administrivia: html duplicates
Sam Liddicott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fsf.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Waring wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:24:24AM +0000, Jon Grant wrote: > >> Outlook, Thunderbird and all the main web mail (MSN, GMail, Yahoo etc) >> compose in HTML format. TBH, perhaps we should just allow HTML mails? >> I've yet to get some badly formatted mess of an HTML email (that was not >> spam) in all my years. >> > > I get badly-formed HTML emails that are difficult to read (and even more > difficult to reply to) in mutt. I can't think of many examples where > plain text couldn't have been used instead, and I have no idea why > Thunderbird defaults to HTML format by default. If someone sends HTML > email to a list (as opposed to me personally), in all likelihood I won't > bother to read it. > Are these html-only emails or emails with an alternative text part that Mutt is having problems with? Sam