Re: Mac OS X refund

Richard Smedley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.uk
Organization M6-IT C.I.C.
Message-ID <1201281114.28199.168.camel@localhost>

Hello Mark,

On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 14:35 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> I agree with the point about emote and practice being different - in
> practice, most of our travel is sustainable (cycles and trains) but
> we've not (yet?) taken the government money that I think was available
> to publish/emote a Green Travel Plan for our business.

Have you an URL?

> A related Q: is starting a new enterprise with 100% free software much
> easier than switching an existing one away from proprietary software?

Without doubt - but there are still many areas in my sector with
no Free Software. E.g. Credit Unions (we're working on it); Dial-a-ride
services (everyone gets small firms to write proprietary apps for
them with VBA); benefits advice (but at least the main software
runs well on WINE, so not a barrier to platform change); case 
management (seriously - lot's of apps available, few good
enough); even the right groupware is a problem - eg if the CEO
has a blackberry.

> Does that suggest barriers to entry are raised by proprietary software
> producers?  

Well, only in that they use VBA instead of real languages,
and Access instead of real databases (actually one major 
app is on the discontinued FoxPro).

> Are such barriers fair or in keeping with a free market?

What free market ;-P

Seriously, the inertia is as much with support organisations
and advisors. Follow the main lists for techies and web designers
in the third sector and you'll see a strong, automatic
preference for MS & other proprietary software from those
in charge. This is reflected in "Open Source" trials that
seem designed to fail, and all FOSS squeezed into minimal
"open source" conference tracks :-(

 - Richard
  (not bitter at all, no really ;)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.