Re: privilege, was: Mac OS X refund

"Andrew Savory" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.uk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/1/08, ana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Savory wrote:
> > No-one is giving closed software a privileged position deliberately -
>
> Except for the patent system and those who develop it, implement it,
> enforce it and/or  take advantage of it?

*sigh*

It's a PITA when every single statement on this list has to be
qualified and explained in intimate detail for fear of being
misunderstood or quoted out of context.

My point was: no-one in _THIS DEBATE ON THIS LIST_ is giving closed
source a privileged position deliberately. I believe the patent system
would fall under the 'etc' in:

"No-one is giving closed software a privileged position deliberately -
though it would certainly be foolish to ignore the fact that it
obviously occupies one simply by dint of being first to market,
cash-rich due to restrictive licensing, etc."

Thanks.

A.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.