Re: Time to boycot OLPC?

"Dave Crossland" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.uk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2008/4/24 Alex Hudson <[email protected]>:
>  I think what OLPC is discovering is that there are sufficient customers who
> want Windows that the dent in their costs is likely to be more than offset
> by the increase in volume they can ship.

That is exactly what is happening; if they make the Sugar UI run on
windows and ship windows, they will sell more laptops. This is a
education project (ie, about putting the Sugar in kids hands) and not
a software freedom project.

I figured something like this was going on when over a month ago I
read the Chief Security Engineer's blog:

"Not long ago, OLPC undertook a drastic internal restructuring coupled
with what, despite official claims to the contrary, is a radical
change in its goals and vision from those that were shared with me
when I was invited to join the project. Adding insult to injury, I was
asked to stop working with Walter Bender, without a doubt one of the
most stunningly thoughtful and competent people I've ever worked with.
Following Walter's demotion from OLPC presidency, I was to report
instead to a manager with no technical or engineering background who
was put in charge of all OLPC technology.

***I cannot subscribe to the organization's new aims or structure in
good faith,*** nor can I reconcile them with my personal ethic. Having
exhausted other options, three weeks ago I resigned my post at OLPC."

http://radian.org/notebook/maintaining-clarity

-- 
Regards,
Dave
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.