UK appeal court upholds wonky pro-swpat ruling

Ciaran O'Riordan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.uk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Complete with gormeless pro-patent rhetoric, timesonline.co.uk reports that,
following the UK IPO's complaint against the High Court's pro-swpat ruling,
the UK Court of Appeal has rejected the IPO's appeal and has instead agreed
with the High Court that, for "complex software", software patents are
valid:

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article4907993.ece

We previously saw a post-Nov-2009 swpat debate as an inevitability that we'd
have to prepare for whether we want it or not.  With this ruling, a new
EU-level legislative proposal is becoming something we might even push for.

(Nov 2009 is when a new European Commission will be chosen.  Commissioner
McCreevy said he'd make no further legislative proposals regarding swpats
during his term, so there's a good chance that something will be launched
when he is replaced.)

I put the relevent part of the European Patent Convention online here with
some links:
http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/why_european_software_patents_are_legally_invalid

-- 
Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/

Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org

Recent blog entries:
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/why_european_software_patents_are_legally_invalid
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/eu_states_to_discuss_internet_filtering
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_rockbox_gnu_releases_and_ffii_s_petition
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/new_monthly_feature_fellowship_interviews
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.