Re: Activity
John¹ <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fsf.uk |
|---|---|
| Organization | SNP |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 27 February 2009 10:53:58 Alex Hudson wrote: > I agree with the spirit of this plan: if there is a demand for such an > organisation, it could certainly happen that way. I'm not sure what > structural changes would be needed to make it successful though: the > real need is active members, so I think the real question is whether or > not such an organisation is in demand and viable. > > I don't think there's anything standing in the way of AFFS becoming > something different, something replacing AFFS, or the whole thing just > going away. It just comes down to having a group of people who are > sufficiently motivated and who have sufficient time to put something > together. Someone pick an option and run with it, I guess. Are you, (Alex Hudson), one of the five existing subscribing members, if not, then I am of the opinion that any plans for the future of the AFFS lie in the hands of those who are still subscribing members. Perhaps they would like to make themselves known? -- John Seago GNU/Linux Registered User No. #219566 http://counter.li.org/