Re: Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.gnu.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear FSF, In response to your call for input regarding the future of the FSF/GNU relationship, Mark Wielaard posted proposals back in December on behalf of several GNU maintainers: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-12/msg00026.html To date, we have not received any feedback. The first of these proposals was: > * leadership > > We believe GNU leadership includes the GNU maintainers who should have > this discussion together with the FSF. That way, the FSF can support > the GNU Project as a whole. > > More generally, we think it is time for the GNU Project to collectively > define its governance structure, in a way that includes all > stakeholders, and that the FSF should facilitate this process. The announcement posted on February 6th on gnu.org¹ reads: Alex Oliva, Henry Poole and John Sullivan (board members or officers of the FSF), and Richard Stallman (head of the GNU Project), have been meeting to develop a general framework which will serve as the foundation for further discussion about specific areas of cooperation. This does not include GNU maintainers who, as stewards for their GNU packages (and for some of them also as signatories of an agreement with the FSF for the Working Together Fund), are part of the GNU leadership and should be equal partners. Could you make sure GNU maintainers can take part in these discussions? Thanks in advance, Ludo’. ¹ https://www.gnu.org/gnu/2020-announcement-1.html
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPORkVYqE/cadtAz7CQsRmT2a67UFAl5AfqgACgkQCQsRmT2a 67WXFBAAnADzYfsFFntWTz27AABytV9Zfd+j6iUr4hHRXLzqrjfiio7XJq90CyJU YeUZ0Q+u7sVQ3RIh/VUUJv7W9LB0z0/udEz4mwQe6L+RskGbUw1PQeSmmGxwsI62 phIp9j5QvVldZD9+16Mu4MJc8mdAi9gLFxF3tzjK+Vb5Kbl8NNxiF5YoMN2K4hHZ 6LlrWEwFNE/fVKxf/ZZjgNJWk0wx3NjAjUypR1VVsMjM3O29WavLVzPBmO/2/Lsy DnXXq3jIPAL6PCQ8+mXRNFtKKLxbRG0543oNsXezb3iTJbhrfmBSmgsPSN8Ggcy4 lYcrJvgD8au9IEoYmQRg5Ku50LB+Bl5b01UNkUZycDhle32g90/Gbtly07m9LyxR dOm4dhsPpDp1GHPQB8O3xGg9Azpw9v+yKGzfXmMmhp68rc2XWe/UymJo5Duif/5Y rZ4CT9JufvSOHnkM6kAgyICYSPn2kP2zcccGFhs3R/Zala7sBulNkTS7Fy7KTaa9 /9e5SroxJ8oS18sRfYld46GIRzcslGOfy3WYxekQ7Ggd8jcSBePF7JXK9e0gnGbd dJtNxyZrU2s4s3vfNbCdAElJbWHM1Aup4q3iOKeVDHshPEqvzydsncPqtsjrhdsj Ns9+52Bempk1B6+4eadn/JXNXKxUL5gHF7qwWmV38ij4dPfOzzU= =TuhW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----