Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.gnu.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2020-02-22 12:31, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Andreas Enge, 22/02/20 21:48: >> If anything, this message shows how much a code of conduct is needed. > > Or maybe it shows there's a language barrier. Let's not rush to judge > non-native English speakers, especially after having admitted that the > meaning of their message is unclear. I'm a native-level English speaker. > I think their contribution can be rephrased as: what kind of message > do you think a document focused on matters like "Enforcement", "Ban", > "Correction", "Warning" gives? Is it the intended message? If not, > what could be done? No, my contribution cannot be rephrased like that. A better approximation of the semantics of my message that the document is the product of a mental sickness that underlies authoritarian personalities. What could be done? Printing it out and burning it, by my estimation.