Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.gnu.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2020-02-22 12:31, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Andreas Enge, 22/02/20 21:48:
>> If anything, this message shows how much a code of conduct is needed.
> 
> Or maybe it shows there's a language barrier. Let's not rush to judge
> non-native English speakers, especially after having admitted that the
> meaning of their message is unclear.

I'm a native-level English speaker.

> I think their contribution can be rephrased as: what kind of message
> do you think a document focused on matters like "Enforcement", "Ban",
> "Correction", "Warning" gives? Is it the intended message? If not,
> what could be done?

No, my contribution cannot be rephrased like that. A better
approximation of the semantics of my message that the document
is the product of a mental sickness that underlies authoritarian
personalities.

What could be done? Printing it out and burning it, by my estimation.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.