Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

On 2020-02-22 19:38, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 20:48:43 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku 
>> (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
>>> > And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us
>>> > being
>>> > powermongers?
>>> 
>>> https://wiki.gnu.tools/wiki:code-of-conduct
>>> "Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" ....
>>> You are sick.
>> 
>> Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation? I find it
>> difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous 
>> insult
>> (following a message that was not even directed at them). Notice that 
>> there
>> is a pattern of overly aggressive messages by Kaz Kylheku.
> 
> I think we can handle this without having to resort to blocking a
> person's messages.
> 
> Kaz, please avoid use of subjective terms like "powermonger" and focus

Everything you see here has passed moderation.

If you don't think I should be able to include quotes of someone
else's text that contains "powermonger", take it up with the moderator.

>   https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html

I think that is useful for communication within projects themselves.
I don't think that should be blindly followed in a self-defeating way
by remaining meek when the project is under attack.