Re: Moderation

On 2/18/20 12:07 AM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 17:25:38 +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> Indeed, given the toxicity on this list, I had presumed there was no
>> moderation (any more).  If it is that modereration is being applied, it is
>> either sorely deficient, or an indication of the language that GNU permits
>> (in spite of the 'kind communication' document).  Which is a good
>> demonstration of why people might not find it a welcoming organization.
> 
> It is worth reminding that readers of this list cannot see the number
> and type of messages being rejected (and so cannot judge what moderation
> is being done), and that this moderation is being done by volunteers on
> their own time.
> 
> It is also worth reminding that it is not possible to make all parties
> happy.  Indeed, moderators get verbal lashings from all sides.

Thanks for confirming the toxicity is acceptable to the list administrators.

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell