Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.org.gnu.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Feb 27, 2020 20:07, Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]> wrote:

On 27/02/20 19:23, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> Of course your opinion matters a lot! As release master and uploader

> for GNU glibc your opinion is very valuable. I am sorry that through a

> technicality you weren't listed in the maintainers file and so were

> excluded from our direct call for discussion and endorsement. But we

> had to start somewhere. And I hope you did have a chance to discuss

> this with the glibc stewards and other maintainers. We will expand the

> discussions to all GNU volunteers over time. But as you might have

> noticed this list might not be the perfect discussion forum. So we are

> working on something better.

Ah, I do not mind at all that I wasn't contacted about this directly; I

didn't even expect it TBH given that I'm not involved in GNU governance.

To be clear, I remain supportive of the idea behind the social contract and a less centralized gnu governance structure and I appreciate that y'all are doing the thankless task of shaping this.

Siddhesh
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.