Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
Mike Gerwitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.gnu.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:58:18 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > The PsyOps techniques that large free software communities are now using > against volunteers, minimising people's views, misquoting/gaslighting, > scapegoating, shaming and emotional blackmail do as much harm or more > than physical violence. I responded in private with some of my thoughts on your position. My recommendation is to use less extreme and hyperbolic comparisons when conveying strong disagreements. If you consider these topics to represent instruments of suppression, you can say so in very different terms that can be discussed in kind and constructive ways. -- Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJeWdg4AAoJEIyRe39dxRui8EwQALA4af9iKSCF4POrgrhkdqnL yQbyrsKVHfPYef95DOx5tzDXrL++qd+zjVvtuIZIIeJUSAUnEJQUtzOFheE6oQHG ntUUsRJrLSNxnv1Ko/koDVAyFqfM9UdytZJXodFuZMA1fHW08IKOH6yiRqDRhtNz 2qfShcXBlaEPo4QGYcubJUXhngjqNMhF7lXmmbNtLyoOmsrxKVwdNn2vONw+0J6a Eotv5/IJ3HiW9LEKXFzsEYi4nJqqpcf4s2RtAv0Nxz5fZQENVeB2CkQ5KdRIJ37/ IipIXGdhCVd95zRBlJZP6+gty/KqIv+khKO2sdH5y4EUCVO4YgA6yzAuP4XU9BeJ XTvdrtL8da8dXAcI81qZX2LGq6tjjH1ZyqQdayP8nQZnAFSK9YmBxNQELeWeSz2p jyBaE1mscgsoXF0D9ygYe+Kkd/8WsKiRaIQ9VO2xwMoTnAw8DxgOEk0dLz8bYMzs /Q93mhUZqwHHGfmgKDSozf68hOgeEiA/yNXX1r2u3Pmlgn+8Y8efj53bHHxxq0Ou Rhsqp16B4xSZ8SBMbJzoWNYau+S2hSAqcEMmvKyRRUwl8EXLaG5YW7DmcclshQTT Rd7ANjmFFFsgBMYnV8lxl9hrrLR0bCYBLDDQfyPVHMkD1LGd0FluftZFOltxYosR oc54aFA8laXSuUq0W/GM =lWxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----