Re: Shannon Dosemagen and the FSF
Ineiev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.gnu.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:06:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > John Darrington wrote: > > > Over the last few years many people have noticed a shift towards > > extremist support of idealogy which is orthogonal to the Free > > Software cause. > > Issues like privacy online, software patents, DRM, open document > formats, etc are also orthogonal to the 4 software freedoms but I > do think they are relevant enough that it makes sense for the FSF > to focus on them. Privacy online is a complicated issue, and parts of it do relate to giving up control over one's own computing, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html Software patents directly obstruct software freedom, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/software-patents.html DRM denies people freedom 1, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/opposing-drm.html Proprietary formats are impossible (or very hard) to process with free software, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Etc is indeed orthogonal to the software freedoms, but the FSF does not focus on it.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEvZ1N7nsv8cvvLuDE4KzT4Mvnh0oFAl5eo4kACgkQ4KzT4Mvn h0rMigf/d1ts0uO6MLzi/+yCBRcjL6jd+Cn4/NZB9Oa8eyeZ7EgKgqO5yJ9CjTNA 9rmzs1mOkEXbAi9MfameHrcz3o5NJN23sJr8+Z2BUpZODsTZDq0sXUm13nGb5Ou4 iH9Zc/JgMb/Ky7Z3+naGoM+Cf5qIOallG1d/GCzLm3WS/n431yVGdtXXnEScKKpd bCb/+f7P2NUKAUV0CHHzM/AtcoIiCjtOo3RFH0ARVsbSoSw97WS8In7NIrox2ISu 3Z8tUhK9w13eA+Havbe77CoWEzqSf6+qteaMavwWOt3EUMhvhsH7WpsFgaE9MB05 7ujVVZ/DO0X+fPN83rC9VfRdYj20Nw== =FA2U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----