Re: Websearch: ranking recent articles higher (was: Bandwidth-hungry services burden the internet)
Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.gnu.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> wrote: > It is fairly well-known that Google ranks newer material above older material. Historic areas of the web are basically in a black hole as far as the Google search is concerned. > > And since many people reach for the Google search engine without even thinking there might be alternatives, those areas of the web basically don't exist. That is, there are some websearch providers that do not rank new and updated articles higher? Why do not they, I wonder? It looks like a pretty sane choice.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 247 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCXs8wTQ0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/Pnr4oA/REY/cL8KRaaoNFUw9TCPeYURsO4c3rclwIgXaGo a37+AQD2EC05KnoLbDa2JIhoXAY9SDE4AfP4aB9AODfEN1wSBw== =kSoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----