Re: Gow, Cygwin alternative refers to GNU programs as open source UNIX tools

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.gnu.discuss
Message-ID <87eeljz7jr.fsf@nckx>
Jean Louis 写道:
> I did not notice it. There are no sources on Github, just 
> binaries

They take some effort to miss: 
<https://github.com/bmatzelle/gow/releases/tag/v0.8.0>.

Is there any evidence that the source doesn't correspond to the 
binaries, e.g., through patching or non-trivial build scripting?

> there is Gow license which is contradictory to GPL license 
> making it

This is the MIT (Expat) licence.  It is not contradictory to the 
GPL.

> unclear that it is majority GNU programs and GPL license:

It is commonplace for software distributions to contain multiple 
compatible licences.  Majority doesn't matter.

> https://github.com/bmatzelle/gow/blob/master/licenses/Gow-License.txt

Why not link to 
<https://github.com/bmatzelle/gow/blob/master/licenses/GPL-License.txt> 
or the directory index?

If one copy of the GPL is unclear, the sources contain 15 more to 
clarify matters.  What upstream could do (if they're even still 
alive) is add a copy of the GPLv3 for convenience.

Best to avoid clearly bogus claims of ‘GPL violation’ when asking.

Kind regards,

T G-R
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 247 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX5iQCA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15b38BAKnuACAn3Hvy+B8Q4h2yfbgihYMaJpMKSK4RXrfc
RzblAQC8Qx/0xdjkmdRiyUGSM4ItSpK/G2zX+OmhEsV8liQHDA==
=WPyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.