Re: [Fwd: Re: Waiting 4 feedback]

Hi cac,
In Bluetooth we also have something called SCO (Synchronous
Connection Oriented Transfer), which is bit orients and not
byte. So in that case we need to do the bit wise processing. If
we are targeting the system to just support ACL (Asynchronous
Connection less) transfer, in that case whatever you are saying
makes sense.
Thanks and Regards
-- Ravi Ranjan Kumar



________________________________________________
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag


---- On 13 Apr 2004 12:34:04, Mohamed Salem ([email protected])
wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Return-Path: <liubo-qOhvQMgWBuvuBjGU1YDckgC/[email protected]>
> Received: from mail8.hotbox.ru ([unix socket]) by
mail8.hotbox.ru (Cyrus
> 	v2.2.3) with LMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:27:13 +0400
> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
> Received: from mx2.hotbox.ru (mx2.hotbox.ru [80.68.244.122])
by
> 	mail8.hotbox.ru (8.12.11/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3D5RCnS052297
for
> 	<[email protected]>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:27:13 +0400
(MSD)
> 	(envelope-from liubo-qOhvQMgWBuvuBjGU1YDckgC/[email protected])
> Received: from pc-server.superwaymicro.com ([211.152.157.142])
by
> 	mx2.hotbox.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3D5R8Zw021831
for
> 	<[email protected]>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:27:11 +0400 (MSD)
(envelope-from
> 	liubo-qOhvQMgWBuvuBjGU1YDckgC/[email protected])
> Received: from shanghai (unknown [172.24.195.115]) by
> 	pc-server.superwaymicro.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F065876A20
for
> 	<[email protected]>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:19:09 +0800 (CST)
> Message-ID: <000701c42118$0d09bc10$73c318ac-qOhvQMgWBuvuBjGU1YDckgC/[email protected]>
> From: =?utf-8?B?5YiY5Y2a?= <liubo-qOhvQMgWBuvuBjGU1YDckgC/[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> References: <200403221438.i2MEctWF079899-4369N2AgR01DZVVK0I9FoQ@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: [NOUR] Waiting 4 feedback
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:27:44 +0800
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> X-SpamTest-Status: Probable Spam
> X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Archiving/Rejecting (2/030321)
> X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard (4/030526)
> X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (72/040412)
> X-SpamTest-Info: {relay has no DNS name}
> X-SpamTest-Method: DNS: not in DNS
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Mohamed;
>         I think you had better briefly describe the frame
format  in the beginning of the  document
> to give designers a top level image of how the bluetooth frame
is built.
>     In  modules definitions, the bit width of input/output
signals isn't specified. So I don't know
> your input is 1 bit width or 8 bits width.
>     Do you think of treating the bitstream of bluetooth byte
by bye instead of bit by bit.Blue tooth
> chip is used in consumer devices which is power sensitive. If
you got your working frenquency lower,
> you can save power dramatically.
> 
> 
> cac
>       
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "msalem" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 10:38 PM
> Subject: [NOUR] Waiting 4 feedback
> 
> 
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > Still waiting for your feedback to proceed the
> > definition of the
> > bitstream Hardware spec.
> > Thanks for your time and interest.
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > Mohamed A.Salem
> > 
> > --------------------------
> > NOUR Mailing List
> > Handasa Arabia Organization
> > http://www.handasarabia.org
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > Message number 133
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> NOUR Mailing List
> Handasa Arabia Organization
> http://www.handasarabia.org
> [email protected]
> 
> Message number 134
> 
> 


--------------------------
NOUR Mailing List
Handasa Arabia Organization
http://www.handasarabia.org
[email protected]

Message number 135