Re: Contents Tab

...

>>ok. recap.
>>
>>1. If the object has those three props, we show the tab.
> 
> 
> Or maybe we should say: if the user has those three permissions on the level
> of the current folder.

yes.

...
>>Given our workflow, let's identify the logic
>>we want and change displayContentsTab.
> 
> 
> Exactly! That's what I would have done next, but a nap got into my way.

you deserve the nap

>>>Why did we see the Contents Tab previously? I'm not quite sure, since
> 
> there
> 
>>>are so many things involved. But I guess that we had some private stuff
> 
> in
> 
>>>the folder - or even on the parent folder level - and thus got a
> 
> different
> 
>>>set of Permissions from the workflow.
>>
>>Yes, and for that matter, why have we seen different behaviors
>>on Windows and Linux?
> 
> 
> I'm not 100% sure that we saw different behaviors on Windows and Linux. I
> have to confess that now, on my local machine - using the exported
> srichinmoyraces.org - I'm not seeing the Contents tab anymore. All right, I
> saw it this night. Then when I started messing around with Security
> settings, looking also at what happens at the Root level, I lost it and
> never really got it back (until I got serious about it and found out the
> stuff reported above). So the question remains, why did I see it in the
> beginning? Well, it might be that the Security settings on the Zope Root
> level come into play here. As I said, settings for the Anonymous user can
> change the behavior for Editors or Members etc. - not what you would expect!
> So there might have been a side effect from the settings on my Zope Root,
> which may vary from the settings on Zopestage Root.

ok, if you think it might not be different behaviors
on W&L, I feel somewhat better.

> 
>>I have changed (in place) 'AND' above to 'or' on the stage.
>>You can confirm that the contents tab does show
>>for editor_usa in places where it didn't before.
>>I am not saying this is the right config, but at
>>least the change is showing up on the stage.
> 
> 
> Zopestage is currently not accessible. Can you please make it clearer to me,
> what you mean by 'I have changed in place' - do you mean you changed the CMF
> code on the filesystem? Or have you just customized it? (The latter approach
> did not work on my machine!!)

I popped srichinmoyraces.org back into
a zeoclient now, after checking our
earlier hypothesis about zeo. Zopestage
has been stable, but the stage mount
of srichinmoyraces.org went away during
the exercise.

I evilly changed it on the filesystem.
If it gives the right behavior, then
we can tackle the dispatch mechanism
and customize it.

Check it out on zopestage, and let us
know. Priyadarshan is looking at it now.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <VasudevaService-K9y3B4ipJAZZAIG4hdpdiNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>.