Re: [OS:N:] Re: Questionaire about the support of students rights and the freedom in the learning environment

James Michael DuPont <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.open-source-now
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Access Systems <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm getting a bit confused maybe by the confusion of what some terms
> mean

Let me try an comment.
> 
> . one there is the pretty well accepted concept of "free" as in free
> speech not free beer.

When I say free, I mean free as in freedom. Libre. Freiheit.

> . Open source does not mean non proprietary, or does it??

Hmm, is this a trick question. I am not talking about open source, I am
talking about the "Open Source" education from redhat. I did not did
not  define it, I can imagine it is written down somewhere.

> . Red Hat is a version of Linux, but Linux is not Red Hat...
Lets not talk about redhat linux in this thread, it is completly
irrelevant.

> . Red Hat (and other providers) have right to make a living under the
> GPL
They can make a living, but the FSEDU seeeks to protects the students
freedom from exploitation by companies and educational institutions.

> . the certification is RedHat CT not Linux CT...big difference I
> think.  if nothting else Red Hat is doing the certifying not Linus T.

Ok, I am not really interested in the certification per se, but the
rights of the people who might want to do this certification.
> 
> . Red Hat provides a lot of "Value added" stuff (tech term) in
> exchange
> for the moneies they charge.

Sure, I just feel that the rights of the students and users should not
be taking away in the process.


> . I have never seen Red Hat (or any other valid distribution) violate
> the
> GPL that I have noticed.

No one is accusing redhat of any violation of anything. In fact, I am
trying to avoid making any acusations at all. I just want to complete
the survey and get it over with. Later red hat will show up with a
result of not providing a FSEDu certified learning environment if they
are not able to respect the students basic freedoms while making money.


> . if you expect Red Hat or any other support you are getting "value
> added" and they have a right under the GPL to charge for that.

Value added can be sold. But what else are you sellling when you buy
this? Are you selling your freedom? Are you selling the freedom of your
students? Are you making your self a new role of the gestapo to control
and monitor your students? Do you have to report suspicious activity to
redhat? 

> 
> ??? what am I missing here???

We are missing copies of the red hat contracts to make futher analysis
of them. Then we can talk facts.

mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
-
For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.