RE: [OS:N:] OSN - what are the best desktop systems foreducational use?
"Brian E. Adams" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.open-source-now |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B445C6D94501974D84FF044B268B5A2114A612@redmond> |
Can you clarify 'linux is far superior to Windows' for me? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Hogan Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OS:N:] OSN - what are the best desktop systems foreducational use? I would consider the classroom and lab environment a controlled setting, with staffing for support (in many cases). You can set policy as to how and where to get bits, have content filtering and firewalling. The desktop != workstation in our strategy. The article you are likely referring to chose the quotes the author thought made for sexy press. And he was right, what was lost is the inferred "ready for Red Hat to commit support and life cycle resources and service agreements" and also lost the context of our roadmap which puts our desktop offering 12 months out. Technically, of course, Linux is far superior to windows. But having suffered through rolling 3000 people from Windows 95 to 98, The majority of which use computers because they have to. It's no picnic when things look and feel and operate mostly the same, but in the case of a corporate workstation the user has to adapt to what the IT folks say to run, and for the IT folks having it hard for the user to double click an attachment that grinds the e-mail system to a halt is a bonus. As for home users, they are a nice combination of very fickle and stubborn. They want to and will install whatever they can et their hands on. They want the option of sticking with exactly that if they wish, and won't even go for clones that are functionally equivalent. So for many many people, if you grant that the desktop market is a MS market, Linux is not ready. It's not dumb enough on the top, despite being smarter underneath. Too much hardware doesn't work out of the box, mime types act differently for different programs, there's not enough standards compliance within many distributions, let alone between them. The last thing I'll mention, before it starts to sound like RH doesn't think it will ever happen, is installation. No matter how easy it gets, it will never be seen as "easy" as a Windows install b/c no one installs Windows. It comes on the machine. For Linux to be the all singing all dancing desktop it needs OEMs, IHVs, ISVs, and developers all looking at that user. --jeremy On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 12:07, [email protected] wrote: > I heard a quote the other day that indicated that someone from redhat did not think that his product was the best desktop for consumer use, I am wondering where it (and the fedora system which is apparently to be the successor) would fit in in an educational setting. > > > _______________________________________________ > Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/ > - > For K12OS technical help join K12OSN: > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn> > _______________________________________________ Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/ - For K12OS technical help join K12OSN: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn> _______________________________________________ Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/ - For K12OS technical help join K12OSN: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>