Re: [OS:N:] Newbie Question: How to

"Ya Lin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.open-source-now
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Chris,

thanks a lot and each response a get brings to light some key things to note 
and yours was very informative.
Yes, it is just a process that I want to go through to have a sense of of 
the full process and learn terminologies along the way.

Thanks again.

Yalin


>From: Chris Spencer <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [OS:N:] Newbie Question: How to
>Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:05:07 -0600
>
>On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:50, Ya Lin wrote:
> > My main goal now is to understand things at the kernel level and I would
> > like to begin by learning to compile Linux.
> > -- I am not even sure if I am stating it right, but instead of buying 
>Red
> > Hat Linux as I did before, I would like to see the process where 
>individuals
> > just jump on the Web and say that they have "compile Linux" -- i.e. with
> > their own preferred options?
> > --For example, a guy once said that to use Linux for computer forensics 
>you
> > are better off compiling your own OS instead of buying say Red Hat.
>
>This is a great learning experience for people and everyone should do it
>at some point...but
>
>One of the great values of the major packaged distributions is security
>updates.  If you are running a server or workstation with connection to
>the Internet you have to make sure your computer stays patched or you
>will be hacked.
>
>Moreover, there is even significant questions to whether compiling your
>own kernel is going to translate to better performance on your system.
>
>We can certainly agree that a poorly compiled kernel will mean worse
>performance.  In some cases though even doing everything right with a
>stock kernel from kernel.org will result in worse performance.
>
>In the first case a kernel can be poorly compiled by not using optimized
>compiler settings for your hardware or by selecting and compiling in
>hardware that isn't needed instead of leaving it as a unused module.
>
>Even if you do everything right there the major distros all(?) backport
>some code from newer kernels into their stable kernels.  This tends to
>add to hardware compatibility and performance.
>
>Anyway, it is a great thing to do...just don't think that doing it will
>lead to better system performance.  In general, it probably won't and it
>will take quite a bit of time.
>
>-Chris
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Subscription and Archive: 
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
>-
>For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
><https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Say “good-bye” to spam, viruses and pop-ups with MSN Premium -- free trial 
offer! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200359ave/direct/01/


_______________________________________________
Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
-
For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.