Re: [OS:N:] Linux on low-end hardware?
Tony Nichols <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:24:39 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.open-source-now |
|---|---|
| Organization | Appalachian Log Structures Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 17:53 -0600, Robert Citek wrote: > What linux distro and setup do people here recommend for low-end > hardware? > > I'm helping out a local non-profit group "refurbish" machines that > they get as donations. This group then uses the machines to teach > young kids about computing and sells the machines to raise a bit of > cash. Most of these machines are low-end x86 machines, e.g. <400 > MHZ, <128 MB RAM, <6 GB HDD, usually a WinModem. Currently, their > standard operating procedure is to triage the machine (if the machine > is not working as a whole, remove parts and assemble a working > machine from parts), wipe the drive, install Windows 98 and some > application software, and configure the modem for dial-up. Because > of licensing restrictions on Windows98, they'd like to move to > Linux. The question is, what distro given the older hardware? > > To date I've tried the following: FeatherLinux, DamnSmallLinux, > VectorLinux, Knoppix (using PDI, no install), Ubuntu (server install > followed by install of xfce4), CentOS (base install followed by > install of xfce4). Each distro has its pluses and minuses but > nothing stood out at the clear choice so far. VectorLinux using xfce4 > +ROX has come the closest to ideal. > > The requirements for a distro, in addition to being able to run on > older hardware, are: > > 1) look/feel similar enough to MS Windows so learning curve is not > too steep. E.g. start-menu, manipulating windows, configuring > system. xfce4 with some tweaks seems to work fairly well, but I'm > curious to know of other's experiences. > > 2) simple to install application software. Installing synaptic on > most debian-based systems addresses this. > > 3) simple to clone or script an install. I'm most familiar with > kickstart, but perhaps there are other solutions. > > 4) provide an obvious upgrade path. Ubuntu looks nicest for this: on > low-end hardware use xfce and on more powerful hardware use KDE/Gnome. > > Of course, the hardest requirement is that it has to be "palatable" > to the other volunteers who are doing the work. In my experience, if > the software is too different (steep learning curve) or gives them > too much headache (too inconsistent, buggy), they walk away. And no > non-profit wants to lose volunteers. > > If anyone wants to share experiences or recommendations, I'd love to > hear them. Or if people know of blogs that already discuss some or > all of what I'm looking for, please do post links. > > Regards, > - Robert This has gotten alot of press coverage (used after Katrina). Here is the url: EZWebPC for free at http://www.livekiosk.com/kioskimages/ezwebpc-1.0-i386.iso _______________________________________________ Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/ - For K12OS technical help join K12OSN: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>