Re: MWEB ADSL IP Blocks
Conrad Zane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andy, Not here to represent or misrepresent. I suppose the 'no-peer/no-intterconnect' thing might have been misunderstood. It was meant as no peer with us and no interconnect with us = international routing. I know they are open to peering. We ourselves are now peering with mweb. I think what they are doing is ballsy, and it's good to see someone actually taking a stand. I just hope they have enough 'pull' to get the other big ISPs to fold and start peering everywhere. That would be an infinitely better solution, and would bring down costs to everyone (and their customers) Conrad Zane [email protected] (t) 021 421 9857 On 09 Nov 2010, at 9:43 PM, Andy Davidson wrote: > On 8 Nov 2010, at 06:55, Conrad Zane wrote: > > Anyone having any sort of direct affect from MWEB's new no-peer/no- > interconnect policy? > Well I am. (bringing in VPNs over a national only diginet line!) > > Hi, Conrad -- > > Are you sure you are not mis-representing MWEB slightly ? Mweb's > policy is *not* no-peer, in fact they have an open peering policy : > > [1]http://www.mweb.com/peering.aspx > > Andy > > References > > 1. http://www.mweb.com/peering.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > IOZ mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz > _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz