Re: Peering IS <> MWEB
Jaco Muller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <61C06764EB467D49864EDCECB146E7B538DB63@06CPT-MBX01.za.ds.naspers.com> |
Hi Keith, From an MWEB perspective the quality and reliability is great. We peer at JINX and CINX on infrastructure and network links with ample spare capacity, so we don't foresee any problems. Regards, Jaco Muller MWEB -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Waters Sent: 08 July 2011 08:04 To: [email protected] Subject: [IOZ] Peering IS <> MWEB Hi All - I'm interested to hear if anyone on the list has any opinion or peferably real-life experience on the quality and reliability of peering between IS and MWEB? I have a customer who might be hosting with MWEB, whose end-users are on the IS network and I would like to advise him accordingly. Please reply to me off-list and I'll endeavour to post a summary back to the list for all those interested. thanks! regards, Keith _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz