Re: opt-out registry comments

andre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.ioz
Organization andre
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ant Brooks said on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 :
> Hi Andre,
> 
> I think you may be confusing two positions here:
> 
not really, it seems I am worse at expressing myself than I thought :)

> 1. Bretton thinks spam is okay, and justifiable because the numbers
>     indicate that it doesn't actually cost that much per person.
> 
Bretton also does not like spam, otherwise he would not have compiled 
all the data that he has :)

> 2. Bretton thinks it is challenging to illustrate just how much of
>     a problem spam is to the law-makers who draft legislation dealing
>     with this sort of thing, because the numbers indicate that it doesn't
>     actually cost that much per person.
> 
Yes, but R10 without the time factor based on millions of email addy's
is huge cost

> Law-makers and politicians are unlikely to be convinced that SA needs
> strong opt-in legislation purely on the strength of the opinions held
> by a large number of Internet industry personalities, no matter how
> vociferously those opinions are expressed.
> 
Yes, but when law makers understand that it is in fact theft, even if
it is only R10 per consumer, I think it places a different view on things.

One of the things I am saying is that in it's basest principles unsolicited
email is in fact theft.

> For effective lobbying on this issue, it's helpful to quantify the
> financial impact of spam, which is what Bretton has spent some time
> doing. His conclusions seem to indicate that the cost per person is
> not actually that high. This is helpful information to have, since
> it means that lobbying efforts should focus on the collective cost
> to the industry and the "hassle factor" for individuals who have
> to spend even a small amount of time dealing with spam.
> 
Maybe more effectively one of the real consumer bodies should have
challenged the ECT Act in constitutional court.

1. That will make news

2. It will highlight the moral position of society more clearly so that
Universities will not be training spammers, among other evils.

3. It will make the case for an opt-in registry far easier to make

4. ?

Warmest Regards :) 

Andre 

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.