Re: Is Neotel playing DNS squatting games?
Calvin Browne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1326095122.27108.6.camel@calvin-work> |
dig dynagen.co.za mx @ns0.neotel.co.za gives me exactly what I'd expect - so I'm not sure what you think is wrong. regards --Calvin On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 06:23 +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > I get the following: > > 10174.3: sending to 41.160.0.4/ns0.neotel.co.za dynagen.co.za mx > 10174: rcvd OK from 41.160.0.4 ( recurse) > Q: dynagen.co.za mx > Auth: dynagen.co.za 1 day ns ns2.above.com > dynagen.co.za 1 day ns ns1.above.com > > (a request to find the MX record(s) for an old, unregistered CO.ZA > domain, from a seemingly legitimate CO.ZA secondary) which in my > opinion is a breach of public trust as DYNAGEN.CO.ZA is not a > registered domain. > > I would think that the CO.ZA administrators and the ZA domain name > authority ought to stop this behaviour? Who at Neotel thinks this is > an acceptable practice? > > ++L > > > _______________________________________________ > IOZ mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz