Re: net neutrality - explained in a humourous way

On 2014/07/01, 14:15, Calvin Browne wrote:
>     If you can't enter into a contract with your clients to, for example,
>     deliver neflix faster or slower than say google video, because of net
>     neutrality laws, then those rights have been expropriated.

It's a tough call for me.  What is private property?  The networks? 
What about the consumers' time being private property?  Poor service is 
a waste of time, or worse, exploitative, an unfair trade if you will, 
even if it's "free".

I can empathize with negativity toward government intervention, but it's 
not always bad.  The extreme is having no government whatsoever.  That 
also goes to the extreme of having no private property.  I guess it's 
ultimately about finding the right balance.


Regards,
Aragon

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz