RE: OT: Routers with highest uptime

Gary Sparkes via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <BLAPR10MB536479CC527434867C3D16C5D575A@BLAPR10MB5364.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Even 23 years ago, not quite the flex.

Remember, SQL Slammer that took out / degraded large chunks of the internet?

That vulnerability had been fixed in a patch released 6 months prior to that incident. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 2:41 PM
To: North American Network Operators Group <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Beecher <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OT: Routers with highest uptime

Yeah, not the flex it used to be.

If you publish a device's uptime, it's not hard to infer what OS might be on it, and know exactly how you can exploit that.

Also agreed with Patrick, if you have any routers in a lab, those are the ones that I'd expect to be updated MORE frequently, not less.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:37 PM Andrew Kirch via NANOG < [email protected]> wrote:

> I... umm... have you consider applying security patches on these any 
> time in the last 10+ years (I'm really not taking the time to do the math here)?
>
> Best practices are simply not to leave a system up unpatched that long 
> anymore.  This is why Netcraft took that metric down.  It encouraged a 
> perverse incentive.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:30 PM Markus via NANOG 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi NANOG,
> >
> > in the past there was the Netcraft website which showed publicly 
> > "Servers with the highest uptime". Sadly that site apparently 
> > doesn't exist anymore.
> >
> > I'm wondering what are the routers worldwide with the highest 
> > uptime. :)
> >
> > I'll make a start. 2x Juniper M7i lab routers running BGP + VRRP:
> >
> > --- JUNOS 12.3R2.5 built 2013-03-22 16:52:47 UTC admin@test01> show 
> > system uptime Current time: 2026-02-25 20:04:26 CET System booted: 
> > 2015-05-16 03:44:05 CEST (562w4d 17:20 ago) Protocols started: 
> > 2015-05-16 03:46:59 CEST (562w4d 17:17 ago) Last configured: 
> > 2026-02-22 18:57:12 CET (3d 01:07 ago) by admin
> >   8:04PM  up 3938 days, 17:20, 1 user, load averages: 0.25, 0.22, 
> > 0.17
> >
> > --- JUNOS 12.3R2.5 built 2013-03-22 16:52:47 UTC admin@test02> show 
> > system uptime Current time: 2026-02-25 20:04:59 CET System booted: 
> > 2015-01-31 03:43:58 CET (577w4d 16:21 ago) Protocols started: 
> > 2015-01-31 03:47:48 CET (577w4d 16:17 ago) Last configured: 
> > 2026-02-19 20:41:16 CET (5d 23:23 ago) by admin
> >   8:04PM  up 4043 days, 16:21, 1 user, load averages: 0.19, 0.08, 
> > 0.07
> >
> > Is that good or "like nothing"? :)
> >
> > Regards
> > Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> >
> >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FF
> 464G2CFUGWLNCLHIFPOBE4HYPMUI4N/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/E7
> LZ2CU5NZMH2Z462NUDXJ6T2ON7A4F7/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2CUO25X6CMU6P45BJGDZVTPEADSBNVTB/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5LVJTT53BDGQGATYK44YHOKFJZ35MJ2B/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.