Can route-views be trusted?

Hank Nussbacher via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,


We had F5 announce a /24 on our behalf.  We then asked F5 to withdraw 
that /24.  Route-views showed the /24 still being announced via an F5 
path.  F5 claims that route-views is incorrect and the route had been 
properly withdrawn.  They state that public route collectors (including 
route-views) reflect what their individual collector peers are seeing at 
a given moment. Due to propagation timing, peer refresh intervals, and 
collector update cycles, visibility across different monitoring 
platforms is not always perfectly synchronized in real time.


Have others seen this type of issues from route-views?


Thanks,

Hank

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GF6SKJK2X3NCOELFTAHZOTRO62DH5G6O/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.